Ex parte Massey

442 S.W.2d 388, 1969 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1191
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 18, 1969
DocketNo. 42231
StatusPublished

This text of 442 S.W.2d 388 (Ex parte Massey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Massey, 442 S.W.2d 388, 1969 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1191 (Tex. 1969).

Opinion

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

This is an application for writ of habeas corpus certified to this court under the provisions of Art. 11.07, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P.

Petitioner is restrained under a judgment of conviction in Cause No. 9267 in the District Court of Shelby County, wherein he was found guilty of felony theft and wherein it was further found that he had twice before been convicted of non-capital felonies and his punishment was assessed at confinement for life under Art. 63, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. under an indictment charging three prior convictions.

The sole question is whether or not this indigent petitioner was represented by counsel at the time he was first convicted, under the name of Albert Karam, in Cause No. 8680 in the Circuit Court of Copiah County in the State of Mississippi for the felony offense of False Pretense, one of the prior convictions alleged for enhancement in his Shelby County conviction.

The trial court who heard this application and certified the same to this Court with his findings of fact and conclusions of law has, after an evidentiary hearing, found that petitioner, who was indigent and did not waive his right to counsel, was not represented by counsel at the prior Mississippi conviction, and that such conviction [389]*389was not available for the purpose of enhancement in his Shelby County trial.

He further found that it was impossible to determine whether the Mississippi conviction was one of the two prior convictions found by the jury to have been established and upon which the sentence of life imprisonment was based.

Since the submission to the jury of the constitutionally infirm Mississippi conviction renders such conviction void under the holding of the Supreme Court of the U. S. in Burgett v. Texas, 389 U.S. 109, 88 S.Ct. 258, 19 L.Ed.2d 319, petitioner is entitled to relief.

It is accordingly ordered that he be released from custody and remanded to the Sheriff of Shelby County there to answer the indictment in Cause No. 9267 absent the enhancement which charged the prior Mississippi conviction.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burgett v. Texas
389 U.S. 109 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
442 S.W.2d 388, 1969 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-massey-texcrimapp-1969.