Ex Parte Mark Hanson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 22, 2021
Docket10-21-00335-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Mark Hanson (Ex Parte Mark Hanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Mark Hanson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-21-00335-CR

EX PARTE MARK HANSON

From the 87th District Court Freestone County, Texas Trial Court No. 02-032-CR-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Mark Hanson has filed a notice of appeal from the denial of his Code of Criminal

Procedure article 11.07 writ of habeas corpus application by the Court of Criminal

Appeals.

The Court of Criminal Appeals and this Court have recognized that “the exclusive

post-conviction remedy in final felony convictions in Texas courts is through a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to [Code of Criminal Procedure article] 11.07.” Olivo v. State, 918

S.W.2d 519, 525 n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07; Ex

parte Mendenhall, 209 S.W.3d 260, 261 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, no pet.). Moreover, only

the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to grant post-conviction habeas corpus in

felony cases. See Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (orig. proceeding); Ater v. Eighth Court of

Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (orig. proceeding). We are therefore

without jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Notwithstanding that we are dismissing this appeal, Hanson may file a motion for

rehearing with this Court within 15 days after this opinion and judgment are rendered if

he believes this opinion and judgment are erroneously based on inaccurate information

or documents. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. Moreover, if Hanson desires to have the opinion

and judgment of this Court reviewed by filing a petition for discretionary review, that

petition must be filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days after either the

day this Court’s judgment is rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing is

overruled by this Court. See id. R. 68.2(a).

MATT JOHNSON Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed December 22, 2021 Do not publish [CR25]

Ex parte Hanson Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Mendenhall
209 S.W.3d 260 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Board of Pardons & Paroles Ex Rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District
910 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Mark Hanson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-mark-hanson-texapp-2021.