Ex Parte Marcus Pilkington

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 23, 2015·No. 10-15-00218-CR·Published

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00218-CR

EX PARTE MARCUS PILKINGTON

From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015-2154-2

ORDER

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is dismissed as moot because, as confirmed in a

letter from his counsel of record, Appellant has been indicted, which establishes probable

cause as a matter of law and thus renders moot his habeas proceeding. See Ex parte Welch,

729 S.W.2d 306, 309 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1987, no pet.) (citing Ex parte Plumb, 595 S.W.2d

544, 545 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1980) (“The return of an indictment establishes

probable cause as a matter of law.”)).

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins (Chief Justice Gray concurs without opinion) Order issued and filed December 23, 2015 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Marcus Pilkington, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Ex Parte Marcus Pilkington (Ex Parte Marcus Pilkington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Plumb
595 S.W.2d 544 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Ex Parte Welch
729 S.W.2d 306 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)