Ex Parte Marcus Pilkington
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-15-00218-CR
EX PARTE MARCUS PILKINGTON
From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015-2154-2
ORDER
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is dismissed as moot because, as confirmed in a
letter from his counsel of record, Appellant has been indicted, which establishes probable
cause as a matter of law and thus renders moot his habeas proceeding. See Ex parte Welch,
729 S.W.2d 306, 309 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1987, no pet.) (citing Ex parte Plumb, 595 S.W.2d
544, 545 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1980) (“The return of an indictment establishes
probable cause as a matter of law.”)).
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins (Chief Justice Gray concurs without opinion) Order issued and filed December 23, 2015 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex Parte Marcus Pilkington (Ex Parte Marcus Pilkington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.