Ex parte Maples

Supreme Court of Florida

Ex parte Maples

97 So. 319, 86 Fla. 151, 1923 Fla. LEXIS 363

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 12, 1923·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a companion ease of Ex Parte E. B. McDaniel, an opinion in which was filed on July 11, 1923.

From the record it appears that the petitioner was in-dieted jointly with E. B. McDaniel and was found not guilty at the trial. The return to the writ is to the effect that he is held in custody by virtue of a verbal order of the Circuit Judge requiring him to be placed in jail and there held until the further order of the Court, and that he was so confined until the issuance of the writ of habeas corpus. The Attorney General advises that the discharge of the petitioner is not contested, but is consented to by the State. An order accordingly will be entered.

So ordered.

Whitfield, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a companion ease of Ex Parte E. B. McDaniel, an opinion in which was filed on July 11, 1923.

From the record it appears that the petitioner was in-dieted jointly with E. B. McDaniel and was found not guilty at the trial. The return to the writ is to the effect that he is held in custody by virtue of a verbal order of the Circuit Judge requiring him to be placed in jail and there held until the further order of the Court, and that he was so confined until the issuance of the writ of habeas corpus. The Attorney General advises that the discharge of the petitioner is not contested, but is consented to by the State. An order accordingly will be entered.

So ordered.

Whitfield, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Ex parte Maples, 97 So. 319, 86 Fla. 151, 1923 Fla. LEXIS 363 (Fla. 1923).

Pincite

97 So. 319 (Ex parte Maples) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.