Ex parte Maltos

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 217
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 13, 1960·No. No. 36443·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the alleged irregularities or errors of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

W EYGANDT, C. J., ZlMMERMAN, TaFT, MATTHIAS, BeLL, Herbert and Peck, J J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Maltos, 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 217 (Ohio 1960).

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 217 (Ex parte Maltos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.