Ex parte Mallinkrodt

20 Mo. 493
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMarch 15, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 20 Mo. 493 (Ex parte Mallinkrodt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Mallinkrodt, 20 Mo. 493 (Mo. 1855).

Opinion

Scott, Judge.

The act of 18th February, 1847, empowered notaries to take depositions under the act concerning “ Depositions, ” approved January 17, 1845. The fifteenth section of the act referred to authorized the officer empowered to take depositions, to compel the attendance of witnesses, in the same manner and under the like penalties as any court of record of this state.

The eighth section of the act concerning witnesses provides [494]*494that any person summoned as a witness and attending, who shall refuse to give evidence, which may lawfully be required to he given by such person, may be committed to prison by the person authorized to take his deposition.

The power of notaries, in taking depositions, is strictly statutory. They can do nothing not expressly authorized and under the circumstances which authorize it. There is no power given to an officer taking depositions to commit a witness for refusing to produce books. Powers in derogation of the liberty of the citizen must be strictly construed.

Let the prisoner be discharged, the other judges concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Venker v. Hyler
352 S.W.2d 590 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1962)
Hollingsworth v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY
286 S.W.2d 182 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1955)
Ex Parte Dillon v. Smedley
29 S.W.2d 236 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1930)
State ex rel. Stroh v. Klene
207 S.W. 496 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1918)
Burnett v. Prince
197 S.W. 241 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1917)
State ex rel. McCulloch v. Taylor
187 S.W. 1181 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1916)
In re Sanford
139 S.W. 376 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1911)
In re Hammond
120 N.W. 203 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1909)
In re Butler
107 N.W. 572 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1906)
Ex parte Lucas
61 S.W. 218 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1901)
Sayles v. Bradley & Metcalf Co.
49 S.W. 209 (Texas Supreme Court, 1899)
Langenberg v. Decker
31 N.E. 190 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1892)
Courtnay v. Knox
48 N.W. 763 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1891)
In re Beardsley
37 Kan. 666 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1887)
Burtt v. Pyle
89 Ind. 398 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Mo. 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-mallinkrodt-mo-1855.