Ex parte Madrazzo
32 U.S. 627
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The case is not a case where the property is in custody of a court of admiralty, or brought within its jurisdiction, and in the posséssion of any private person. It is not, therefore, one for the exercise of that jurisdiction. It is a mere personal suit against a state to recover proceeds in its possession, and in süch a case no private person has a right to commence an original suit in this court against a state.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex parte Madrazzo, 32 U.S. 627 (1833).
32 U.S. 627 (Ex parte Madrazzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Valley Line Co. v. The M/V City of Greenville
581 F. Supp. 1287 (E.D. Missouri, 1984)
Adams v. Harris County, Texas
316 F. Supp. 938 (S.D. Texas, 1970)
Ex Parte Juan Madrazzo
32 U.S. 627 (Supreme Court, 1833)