Ex Parte Lundy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte Lundy

85 So. 821, 204 Ala. 492, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 243

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 30, 1920

Docket4 Div. 892.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 So. 821 (Ex Parte Lundy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Lundy, 85 So. 821, 204 Ala. 492, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 243 (Ala. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

McCLELLAN, j.

The questions argued in the brief in support of the application for certiorari were correctly decided by the Court of. Appeals. 85 South. 819. The reference in the opinion of the Court of Appeals to the photograph of the deceased might be interpreted as casting doubt upon the correctness of the action of the trial court in admitting that photograph in evidence. The photo was properly received in evidence. Sanders v. State, 202 Ala. 37, 79 South. 375, 376.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCLELLAN, j.

The questions argued in the brief in support of the application for certiorari were correctly decided by the Court of. Appeals. 85 South. 819. The reference in the opinion of the Court of Appeals to the photograph of the deceased might be interpreted as casting doubt upon the correctness of the action of the trial court in admitting that photograph in evidence. The photo was properly received in evidence. Sanders v. State, 202 Ala. 37, 79 South. 375, 376.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 So. 821, 204 Ala. 492, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-lundy-ala-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack