Ex Parte Lundy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte Lundy

85 So. 821, 204 Ala. 492, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 243

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 30, 1920·No. 4 Div. 892.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

McCLELLAN, j.

The questions argued in the brief in support of the application for certiorari were correctly decided by the Court of. Appeals. 85 South. 819. The reference in the opinion of the Court of Appeals to the photograph of the deceased might be interpreted as casting doubt upon the correctness of the action of the trial court in admitting that photograph in evidence. The photo was properly received in evidence. Sanders v. State, 202 Ala. 37, 79 South. 375, 376.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCLELLAN, j.

The questions argued in the brief in support of the application for certiorari were correctly decided by the Court of. Appeals. 85 South. 819. The reference in the opinion of the Court of Appeals to the photograph of the deceased might be interpreted as casting doubt upon the correctness of the action of the trial court in admitting that photograph in evidence. The photo was properly received in evidence. Sanders v. State, 202 Ala. 37, 79 South. 375, 376.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Ex Parte Lundy, 85 So. 821, 204 Ala. 492, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 243 (Ala. 1920).

Pincite

85 So. 821 (Ex Parte Lundy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related