Ex Parte Lively
1930 OK 24, 284 P. 2, 141 Okla. 85, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 22
Opinion
The petitioner, seeking release from the custody of the sheriff of Oklahoma county, whose warrant and authority is a commitment directing that petitioner be confined in the county jail until he obeys a certain maintenance order, and “until otherwise ordered by the court”, brings himself clearlv within the rule announced in Re John Curtis, 10 Okla. 660, 63 Pac. 963. See, also, Wells v. Wells, 46 Okla. 88, 148 Pac. 723. He is therefore entitled to be released. Writ granted.
Note. — See “Contempt,’’ 33 C. J. § 131, p. 86, n. 33.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex Parte Lively, 1930 OK 24, 284 P. 2, 141 Okla. 85, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 22 (Okla. 1930).
1930 OK 24 (Ex Parte Lively) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Bd. of Medical Examiners v. Weiner
172 A.2d 661 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
M. Dietz & Sons, Inc. v. Miller
128 A.2d 719 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
HOFF EX REL. HOFF v. Natural Refining Products Co.
118 A.2d 714 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)