Ex Parte Lively

1930 OK 24, 284 P. 2, 141 Okla. 85, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 22
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 14, 1930
Docket20629
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1930 OK 24 (Ex Parte Lively) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Lively, 1930 OK 24, 284 P. 2, 141 Okla. 85, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 22 (Okla. 1930).

Opinion

RILEY, J.

The petitioner, seeking release from the custody of the sheriff of Oklahoma county, whose warrant and authority is a commitment directing that petitioner be confined in the county jail until he obeys a certain maintenance order, and “until otherwise ordered by the court”, brings himself clearlv within the rule announced in Re John Curtis, 10 Okla. 660, 63 Pac. 963. See, also, Wells v. Wells, 46 Okla. 88, 148 Pac. 723. He is therefore entitled to be released. Writ granted.

MASON, C. J. , LESTER, V. C. J., and CLARK, HUNT, HEFNER, OULLISON, SWINDALL, and ANDREWS, JJ, concur.

Note. — See “Contempt,’’ 33 C. J. § 131, p. 86, n. 33.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Bd. of Medical Examiners v. Weiner
172 A.2d 661 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
M. Dietz & Sons, Inc. v. Miller
128 A.2d 719 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
HOFF EX REL. HOFF v. Natural Refining Products Co.
118 A.2d 714 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1930 OK 24, 284 P. 2, 141 Okla. 85, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-lively-okla-1930.