Ex Parte Littrell

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte Littrell

1919 OK CR 220, 182 P. 733, 16 Okla. Crim. 691, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 216

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 12, 1919

DocketNo. A-3064.

StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 220 (Ex Parte Littrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Littrell, 1919 OK CR 220, 182 P. 733, 16 Okla. Crim. 691, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 216 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Jess Littrell, filed his petition in this court on the 5th day of July, 1917, praying that a writ of habeas corpus issue for the purpose of being admitted to bail, being in custody under an order of commitment by an examining magistrate on a charge of having murdered one L. M. Boulware.

Petitioner avers that he is not guilty of the crime of murder as charged, and that the proof of his guilt of the charge of murder is not evident, nor the presumption thereof great.

On August 7, 1917, a supplemental petition was filed, at which time, upon consideration of the petitions it was the opinion of the court that petitioner was not as a matter of legal right entitled to be admitted to bail, and it was ordered and adjudged that the writ he denied, and bail refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Jess Littrell, filed his petition in this court on the 5th day of July, 1917, praying that a writ of habeas corpus issue for the purpose of being admitted to bail, being in custody under an order of commitment by an examining magistrate on a charge of having murdered one L. M. Boulware.

Petitioner avers that he is not guilty of the crime of murder as charged, and that the proof of his guilt of the charge of murder is not evident, nor the presumption thereof great.

On August 7, 1917, a supplemental petition was filed, at which time, upon consideration of the petitions it was the opinion of the court that petitioner was not as a matter of legal right entitled to be admitted to bail, and it was ordered and adjudged that the writ he denied, and bail refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1919 OK CR 220, 182 P. 733, 16 Okla. Crim. 691, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-littrell-oklacrimapp-1919.