Ex Parte Lewis
414 So. 2d 140
Opinion
The only question presented by the petition for writ of certiorari is whether the witness, Cross, is an accomplice as a matter of law. The writ will not issue because the Court of Criminal Appeals has reached the right result,
WRIT DENIED.
TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, EMBRY and ADAMS, JJ., concur. *Page 141
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex Parte Lewis, 414 So. 2d 140 (Ala. 1982).
414 So. 2d 140 (Ex Parte Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Snyder v. State
893 So. 2d 488 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2003)
Deutcsh v. State
610 So. 2d 1212 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Harris v. State
632 So. 2d 503 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Salter v. State
578 So. 2d 1092 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Bankhead v. State
585 So. 2d 97 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Lauderdale v. State
555 So. 2d 799 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1989)
Patterson v. State
538 So. 2d 37 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1987)
Creech v. State
508 So. 2d 302 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1987)
Williams v. State
497 So. 2d 595 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Hodges v. State
500 So. 2d 1273 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Nichols v. State
500 So. 2d 92 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
McCall v. State
501 So. 2d 496 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Hayes v. State
507 So. 2d 982 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Wyllie v. State
445 So. 2d 958 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1983)
Inzer v. State
447 So. 2d 838 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1983)