Ex parte Legume

Nevada Supreme Court

Ex parte Legume

33 Nev. 319

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided July 15, 1910·No. No. 1904·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In an opinion in case No. 1903, filed this date, entitled “In the Matter of the Application of R. A. Davis for a Writ of Habeas Corpus,” the questions involved and the law applicable thereto are the same as those involved in the above-entitled case. Upon the authority of said case, and for reasons given therein, the petitioner in the present ease is discharged.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

In an opinion in case No. 1903, filed this date, entitled “In the Matter of the Application of R. A. Davis for a Writ of Habeas Corpus,” the questions involved and the law applicable thereto are the same as those involved in the above-entitled case. Upon the authority of said case, and for reasons given therein, the petitioner in the present ease is discharged.

It is so ordered.

Ex parte Legume, 33 Nev. 319 (Neb. 1910).

Pincite

33 Nev. 319 (Ex parte Legume) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.