Ex parte Lee

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Ex parte Lee

15 F. Cas. 134, 4 D.C. 197, 4 Cranch 197

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedApril 15, 1832

StatusPublished

This text of 15 F. Cas. 134 (Ex parte Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex parte Lee, 15 F. Cas. 134, 4 D.C. 197, 4 Cranch 197 (circtddc 1832).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

said it was a question of practice-; and requested information as to the practice in the courts of Virginia. Mr. R. J. Taylor said the practice was as stated by Mr. Lee. Precedents were also produced in the time of Colonel Deneale ; and on this day, (3d May, 1832,) a letter from Mr. Phillips, the clerk of the Court at Fauquier, in Virginia, was produced, confirming Mr. Lee's statement of the practice.

The Court (Thrüston, J., absent,) decided the point in favor of the clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

said it was a question of practice-; and requested information as to the practice in the courts of Virginia. Mr. R. J. Taylor said the practice was as stated by Mr. Lee. Precedents were also produced in the time of Colonel Deneale ; and on this day, (3d May, 1832,) a letter from Mr. Phillips, the clerk of the Court at Fauquier, in Virginia, was produced, confirming Mr. Lee's statement of the practice.

The Court (Thrüston, J., absent,) decided the point in favor of the clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 F. Cas. 134, 4 D.C. 197, 4 Cranch 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-lee-circtddc-1832.