Ex parte Lawrence
5 Binn. 304, 1812 Pa. LEXIS 65
Opinion
We do not think that the act 'of assembly obliges this Court to grant a habeas corpus, where the case has been already heard upon the same evidence by another court; and we do not think it expedient in this case, because it has been already heard upon the same evidence, and the party is not without remedy, as he may resort to a homine replegiando. The Court are not however to be understood as saying, that they have not authority to issue a habeas corpus in such a case, if they should think it expedient.
Habeas corpus refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex parte Lawrence, 5 Binn. 304, 1812 Pa. LEXIS 65 (Pa. 1812).
5 Binn. 304 (Ex parte Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miskimmins v. Shaver
58 P. 411 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1899)
State v. Malone
35 Tenn. 699 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1856)
Passmore Williamson's Case
26 Pa. 9 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1855)