Ex parte La Farge

6 Cow. 61
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1826·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Curia.

This is not such an entitling of the affidavit, as comes within the rule relied on, that an affidavit entitled cannot be read. It is not entitled in any cause as pending in this court.

As to the merits of the motion, however, clearly there was no payment. The writing was a mere acknowledgment that La Farge owed the costs ; and a request that they should be charged to him. To entitle him to an appeal, the party must comply strictly with the terms of the statute. The money must be actually paid.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte La Farge, 6 Cow. 61 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1826).

6 Cow. 61 (Ex parte La Farge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Thomas
25 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 481 (New York Supreme Court, 1879)
Trigg v. Larson
10 Minn. 220 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1865)