Ex Parte Kristina Schweyer v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Opinion issued June 17, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in proceedings
brought pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. See TEX. CODE
CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07; Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 525 n. 8 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1996); Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth
Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715,
717 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). “Courts of appeals
have no jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony
cases. Article 11.07 contains no role for the courts of appeals.” In re Briscoe, 230
S.W.3d 196, 196 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding) (internal
citations omitted).
Accordingly, we dismiss Schweyer’s petition for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Guiney, and Morgan.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex Parte Kristina Schweyer v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Kristina Schweyer v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.