Ex parte Knight
This text of 4 Blackf. 220 (Ex parte Knight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
HELD, that the record of a judgment by confession, rendered by a justice of the peace in 1833, should show that an oath relative to the fairness of the proceedings, as prescribed by the statute of 1831, was taken by the defendant, or the judgment is of no validity. Rev. Code, 1831, p. 298. M’Fadin v. Gill, Nov. term, 1824
But the omission of the oath does not now affect the validity of the judgment at the instance of the defendant, his heirs, &c. Stat. 1835, p. 51.—Rev. Stat. 1838, p. 365. And by the last-oited statute, the oath is not required unless the judgment exceed 20 dollars.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Blackf. 220, 1836 Ind. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-knight-ind-1836.