Ex Parte King

233 S.W.2d 501, 155 Tex. Crim. 217, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1810
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 1, 1950
DocketNo. 24944
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 233 S.W.2d 501 (Ex Parte King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte King, 233 S.W.2d 501, 155 Tex. Crim. 217, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1810 (Tex. 1950).

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Relator is a prisoner in the state penitentiary and addresses his original petition to this court seeking his discharge from the custody of the penitentiary officials.

The petition alleges that appellant was charged with murder in the district court of Sabine County; that he was tried by [218]*218a jury which returned a verdict on the 20th day of November, 1946, and assessed his punishment at twenty-five years in the penitentiary. It then recites that the judgment of the district court was entered that he “be confined to the penitentiary for a term of not less than two nor more than twenty-five years.”

Certified copies of the proceedings have been obtained and are before us in considering this application. The original judgment contains the jury’s verdict as follows: “We the jury find the defendant Z. T. King guilty as charged in the indictment and assess his punishment at twenty-five years confinement in the State Penitentiary. H. E. Reeves, Foreman.”

The court has no authority to enter a judgment for any term other than that specified in the jury’s verdict. In as much as it is contained in the judgment it makes the same definite, regardless of the further recitation that he is to serve “for a term of not less than 2 years nor more than 25 years.” See Ex Parte Simmons, 154 Tex. Cr. R. 544, 229 S. W. 2d 167.

The relief prayed for is denied and appellant is remanded to the authorities of the state penitentiary to serve the term assessed against him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cebula v. State
828 S.W.2d 234 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Custard v. State
746 S.W.2d 4 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 S.W.2d 501, 155 Tex. Crim. 217, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-king-texcrimapp-1950.