Ex Parte Kimbrough

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte Kimbrough

1936 OK CR 82, 60 P.2d 216, 59 Okla. Crim. 363, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 50

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 14, 1936

DocketNo. A-9185.

StatusPublished

This text of 1936 OK CR 82 (Ex Parte Kimbrough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Kimbrough, 1936 OK CR 82, 60 P.2d 216, 59 Okla. Crim. 363, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 50 (Okla. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus for bail. Petitioner alleges he is unlawfully restrained by the sheriff of Okmulgee county; that he is charged with murder in said county and has been held by a committing magistrate without bail. That the proof of the commission of the capital offense is not evident nor the presumption great, and that he is entitled to bail.

The case is presented on a stipulation of facts and on oral testimony. Upon a consideration thereof, the court is of the opinion that the proof of the capital offense is not evident nor the presumption great, and that the petitioner is entitled to bail.

It is therefore ordered that petitioner be granted bail, and the same is fixed at the sum of fl5,000, sureties to be approved by the court clerk of Okmulgee county. That upon the execution and approval of said bail the petitioner be discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus for bail. Petitioner alleges he is unlawfully restrained by the sheriff of Okmulgee county; that he is charged with murder in said county and has been held by a committing magistrate without bail. That the proof of the commission of the capital offense is not evident nor the presumption great, and that he is entitled to bail.

The case is presented on a stipulation of facts and on oral testimony. Upon a consideration thereof, the court is of the opinion that the proof of the capital offense is not evident nor the presumption great, and that the petitioner is entitled to bail.

It is therefore ordered that petitioner be granted bail, and the same is fixed at the sum of fl5,000, sureties to be approved by the court clerk of Okmulgee county. That upon the execution and approval of said bail the petitioner be discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1936 OK CR 82, 60 P.2d 216, 59 Okla. Crim. 363, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-kimbrough-oklacrimapp-1936.