Ex Parte Kendall

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte Kendall

1925 OK CR 115, 233 P. 774, 29 Okla. Crim. 304, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 103

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 7, 1925

DocketNo. A-5172.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 115 (Ex Parte Kendall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Kendall, 1925 OK CR 115, 233 P. 774, 29 Okla. Crim. 304, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 103 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, J.

In this proceeding, John A. Kendall, petitioner, filed in this court on May 15, 1924, his duly verified petition alleging that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty by E. C. London, sheriff of Carter county; that the cause of said restraint is that he is being held upon an indictment charging, him with the murder of one Maynard Kendall, which indictment was returned by the grand jury in the district court of Carter county on the 3rd day of May, 1924; that petitioner has been remanded to the custody of said sheriff by W. F. Freeman, judge of said district court, after a full and complete hearing, on a proceeding in habeas corpus to await trial upon said *305 charge without bail; that said restraint and imprisonment are illegal, for the reason that there was no competent or legal evidence introduced on said proceeding showing the commission of the crime of murder, or probable cause to believe petitioner to be guilty of the crime of murder, and at most the proof of his guilt is not evident, nor the presumption thereof great, by reason whereof he is entitled to be admitted to bail upon said charge.

On May 16, 1924, by agreement of the parties the cause was heard upon the evidence taken upon the habeas corpus proceeding before Judge Freeman of the district court of Carter county. Upon a consideration of the testimony and the argument of counsel, it was the opinion of the court that under the evidence submitted, the proof of petitioner’s guilt is not evident nor the presumption thereof great, and that he is accordingly entitled as a matter of right to be admitted to bail. It was therefore on said day adjudged and ordered that petitioner, John A. Kendall, be admitted to bail upon the charge of murder now pending against him in the district court of Carter county, and that his bond be fixed at the sum of $25,000, bond to be conditioned as by law required; and that he be released from custody upon ha® executing and causing to be filed with and approved by the court clerk of Carter county a good and sufficient bond in said sum, conditioned as required by law.

MATSON, P. J., and BESSEY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, J.

In this proceeding, John A. Kendall, petitioner, filed in this court on May 15, 1924, his duly verified petition alleging that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty by E. C. London, sheriff of Carter county; that the cause of said restraint is that he is being held upon an indictment charging, him with the murder of one Maynard Kendall, which indictment was returned by the grand jury in the district court of Carter county on the 3rd day of May, 1924; that petitioner has been remanded to the custody of said sheriff by W. F. Freeman, judge of said district court, after a full and complete hearing, on a proceeding in habeas corpus to await trial upon said *305 charge without bail; that said restraint and imprisonment are illegal, for the reason that there was no competent or legal evidence introduced on said proceeding showing the commission of the crime of murder, or probable cause to believe petitioner to be guilty of the crime of murder, and at most the proof of his guilt is not evident, nor the presumption thereof great, by reason whereof he is entitled to be admitted to bail upon said charge.

On May 16, 1924, by agreement of the parties the cause was heard upon the evidence taken upon the habeas corpus proceeding before Judge Freeman of the district court of Carter county. Upon a consideration of the testimony and the argument of counsel, it was the opinion of the court that under the evidence submitted, the proof of petitioner’s guilt is not evident nor the presumption thereof great, and that he is accordingly entitled as a matter of right to be admitted to bail. It was therefore on said day adjudged and ordered that petitioner, John A. Kendall, be admitted to bail upon the charge of murder now pending against him in the district court of Carter county, and that his bond be fixed at the sum of $25,000, bond to be conditioned as by law required; and that he be released from custody upon ha® executing and causing to be filed with and approved by the court clerk of Carter county a good and sufficient bond in said sum, conditioned as required by law.

MATSON, P. J., and BESSEY, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 115, 233 P. 774, 29 Okla. Crim. 304, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-kendall-oklacrimapp-1925.