Ex parte Kellogg

3 Cow. 372
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1824·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The statute is merely directory. True, if

the Justice does not return on or before the first day of the next term after the appeal, it is an omission of duty ; but the party is not to suffer by this. If filed at any time afterwards, he may proceed in his appeal. The statute does not require that the payment of costs should be endorsed upon the bond. If, in fact, paid, this is enough ; and the contrary is not pretended.

Motion denied,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Kellogg, 3 Cow. 372 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).

3 Cow. 372 (Ex parte Kellogg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kerr v. . Kerr
41 N.Y. 272 (New York Court of Appeals, 1869)