Ex Parte Keith Russell v. the State of Texas
This text of Ex Parte Keith Russell v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Keith Russell v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-23-00289-CR
EX PARTE KEITH RUSSELL
From the 361st District Court1 Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 23-01878-CRM-361
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On September 28, 2023, Keith Russell filed a pro se notice of appeal from the trial
court’s order denying his pretrial habeas corpus application seeking bail reduction. The
trial court’s order was signed by an associate judge on May 25, 2023. See TEX. GOV’T CODE
ANN. § 54A.013 (stating that “[n]ot later than the 30th day after the date an action is taken
by an associate judge, a referring court may modify correct, reject, reverse, or recommit
for further information the action taken by the associate judge“ and that “[i]f the court
does not modify, correct, reject, reverse, or recommit an action to the associate judge, the
action becomes the decree of the court”). Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2(a)(1)
The case was pending in County Court at Law No. 2 when the order appealed from was signed; 1
however, by the time the notice of appeal was filed, the case had been transferred to the 361st District Court. requires an appellant’s notice of appeal to be filed within thirty days after the day the
trial court enters an appealable order. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Russell’s notice of appeal
is therefore untimely, and we have no jurisdiction of an untimely appeal. See id.; Olivo v.
State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (no appellate jurisdiction where notice
of appeal is untimely). For the reasons stated, this appeal is dismissed.
Notwithstanding that we are dismissing this appeal, Russell may file a motion for
rehearing with this Court within 15 days after this opinion and judgment are rendered if
he believes this opinion and judgment are erroneously based on inaccurate information
or documents. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. Moreover, if Russell desires to have the opinion
and judgment of this Court reviewed by filing a petition for discretionary review, that
petition must be filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days after either the
day this Court’s judgment is rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing is
overruled by this Court. See id. R. 68.2(a).
MATT JOHNSON Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed October 19, 2023 Do not publish [CR25]
Ex parte Russell Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Keith Russell v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-keith-russell-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.