Ex Parte: Karl Kauffman v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 28, 2023
Docket12-23-00011-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte: Karl Kauffman v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte: Karl Kauffman v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte: Karl Kauffman v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

NOS. 12-23-00011-CR 12-23-00012-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

§ APPEALS FROM THE 369TH EX PARTE § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT KARL KAUFFMAN § CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Appellant, Karl Kauffman, filed a motion to withdraw these appeals. The motion is signed by Appellant and his counsel. No decision has been delivered in either appeal. Accordingly, Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeals are dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Opinion delivered April 28, 2023. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

APRIL 28, 2023

NO. 12-23-00011-CR

EX PARTE: KARL KAUFFMAN

Appeal from the 369th District Court of Cherokee County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 22279)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J COURT OF APPEALS

NO. 12-23-00012-CR

Appeal from the 369th District Court of Cherokee County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 22288)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte: Karl Kauffman v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-karl-kauffman-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.