Ex Parte Justes
172 N.E. 307, 121 Ohio St. 628, 121 Ohio St. (N.S.) 628, 1930 Ohio LEXIS 339
This text of 172 N.E. 307 (Ex Parte Justes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ex Parte Justes, 172 N.E. 307, 121 Ohio St. 628, 121 Ohio St. (N.S.) 628, 1930 Ohio LEXIS 339 (Ohio 1930).
Opinion
This cause came on to be heard upon the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and was submitted to the Court. Upon consideration whereof it is ordered by the Court that said petition be, and the same is, denied for the reason that the petitioner has an adequate remedy at law.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Roden v. Hubbard
417 N.E.2d 1255 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1981)
Weigel v. Grossnickle
135 N.E.2d 894 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1954)
Clendenning v. McCall
60 N.E.2d 676 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1945)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
172 N.E. 307, 121 Ohio St. 628, 121 Ohio St. (N.S.) 628, 1930 Ohio LEXIS 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-justes-ohio-1930.