Ex Parte Jorita Hagins

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 27, 2013
Docket07-13-00077-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Jorita Hagins (Ex Parte Jorita Hagins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Jorita Hagins, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-13-0077-CR ________________________

Ex parte Jorita Hagins, Relator

Original Proceeding

March 27, 2013

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Pending before the court is a document filed by relator Jorita Hagins, pro se, entitled "Motion For Release of Appellant [Hagins][,] Correction of Documents and or Class Action Civil Suite [sic]." Furthermore, she states the motion is filed pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. In said motion, Hagins seeks a writ of habeas corpus seeking release from mandatory supervision (parole) as her time received upon her conviction was completed in 2004. However, according to Hagins, the "Mandatory Supervision Parole Certificate" shows the discharge date has been altered and "2024" was written in the place of 2004. We dismiss the petition. Hagins is not appealing from an order denying her habeas relief. Instead, she initiated an original proceeding with us, citing art. 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure as authority to do so. However, we have no jurisdiction over art. 11.07 proceedings. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2012); see Runnels v. State, 804 S.W.2d 278 (Tex. App. - Beaumont 1991, no pet.); see also Watson v. State, 96 S.W.3d 497, 500 (Tex. App. - Amarillo 2002, pet. ref'd) (holding that courts of appeal lack the authority to issue original writs of habeas corpus in other than certain civil matters); see also Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004) (providing the authority to issue certain writs). Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watson v. State
96 S.W.3d 497 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Runnels v. State
804 S.W.2d 278 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Jorita Hagins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-jorita-hagins-texapp-2013.