Ex Parte Jones

Alabama Court of Appeals

Ex Parte Jones

165 So. 918, 27 Ala. App. 653

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 21, 1936·No. 6 Div. 894.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.'

In accordance with, and in response to, the mandate of the Supreme Court issued in the case of Ex parte Robert J. Wheeler, as Judge, etc., 231 Ala. 359, 165 So. 76, Supreme Court, the petition for mandamus in the above-styled cause is hereby dismissed.

In making this order, we feel it our duty to say that this court, as such, never assumed jurisdiction of the mandamus proceeding, that it was never called to the attention of the court, and no action has ever been taken thereon, and, but for the mandate of the Supreme Court, above referred to, an order of dismissal would be unnecessary.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.'

In accordance with, and in response to, the mandate of the Supreme Court issued in the case of Ex parte Robert J. Wheeler, as Judge, etc., 231 Ala. 359, 165 So. 76, Supreme Court, the petition for mandamus in the above-styled cause is hereby dismissed.

In making this order, we feel it our duty to say that this court, as such, never assumed jurisdiction of the mandamus proceeding, that it was never called to the attention of the court, and no action has ever been taken thereon, and, but for the mandate of the Supreme Court, above referred to, an order of dismissal would be unnecessary.

Dismissed.

Ex Parte Jones, 165 So. 918, 27 Ala. App. 653 (Ala. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

165 So. 918 (Ex Parte Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related