Ex Parte Jones

165 So. 918, 27 Ala. App. 653
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 21, 1936
Docket6 Div. 894.
StatusPublished

This text of 165 So. 918 (Ex Parte Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Jones, 165 So. 918, 27 Ala. App. 653 (Ala. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.'

In accordance with, and in response to, the mandate of the Supreme Court issued in the case of Ex parte Robert J. Wheeler, as Judge, etc., 231 Ala. 359, 165 So. 76, Supreme Court, the petition for mandamus in the above-styled cause is hereby dismissed.

In making this order, we feel it our duty to say that this court, as such, never assumed jurisdiction of the mandamus proceeding, that it was never called to the attention of the court, and no action has ever been taken thereon, and, but for the mandate of the Supreme Court, above referred to, an order of dismissal would be unnecessary.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wheeler
165 So. 76 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
165 So. 918, 27 Ala. App. 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-jones-alactapp-1936.