Ex parte Joiner

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ex parte Joiner

876 S.W.2d 875, 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 17, 1994 WL 25497

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 1, 1994

DocketNo. 25981-01

StatusPublished

This text of 876 S.W.2d 875 (Ex parte Joiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex parte Joiner, 876 S.W.2d 875, 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 17, 1994 WL 25497 (Tex. 1994).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This Court affirmed applicant’s capital murder conviction and sentence of death on direct appeal. Joiner v. State, 825 S.W.2d 701 (Tex.Crim.App.1992). The trial court has scheduled applicant’s execution to be carried out on or before sunrise, February 4, 1994.

By the instant motion, applicant seeks a stay of execution in order to allow time to recruit an attorney to represent him and prepare a post conviction application for writ of habeas corpus under Art. 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. Applicant has not seen fit to present his latest request for a stay of execution to the convicting court. Finally, the motion before this Court contains no color-able claim for habeas corpus relief.

We find we do not have jurisdiction to grant the relief requested by applicant. The granting of such relief would in no manner tend to protect this Court’s jurisdiction or enforce a judgment of this Court. See Tex. Const., Art. V, Sec. 5; Ex parte Lockhart, 868 S.W.2d 346 (Tex.Crim.App.1993). The relief sought is denied without prejudice to the applicant to apply to the convicting court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

McCORMICK, P.J., and BAIRD, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI