Ex parte Johnson

99 S.W.2d 598, 131 Tex. Crim. 438, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 620
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 21, 1936
DocketNo. 18681
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 99 S.W.2d 598 (Ex parte Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Johnson, 99 S.W.2d 598, 131 Tex. Crim. 438, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 620 (Tex. 1936).

Opinions

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The relator, Tom Louis Johnson, was charged with and convicted of the theft of a pistol. He plead guilty to the offense charged. There was entered in his behalf the plea that he should be given the benefit of the law relating to a delinquent child. He was accordingly sentenced to serve a term of two years in the State Juvenile Training School at Gatesville. No appeal was taken from the conviction in the County Court of Bastrop County. Subsequently the relator presented as a ground for his release that, as a matter of fact, he was not a delinquent child but was over the age of seventeen years. On the hearing of an application for a writ of habeas corpus a judgment was entered against the contention of the relator and he was remanded to the custody of the Superintendent of the State Juvenile Training School.

Relator contends upon this appeal that he was entitled to discharge from his detention under a writ of habeas corpus. His contention is met by that of the State to the effect that the matter having been settled upon a trial in due form, the relator is not in a position to raise the same question, that is, the question of age, in a habeas corpus proceeding. See Ex parte McKay, 82 Texas Crim. Rep., 221; Ex parte Fisher, 28 S. W. (2d) 561; Ex parte Wells, 14 S. W. (2d) 1027; Ex parte Wilcox, 79 S. W. (2d) 321. The conclusion of the District Court of Coryell County that the judgment of the County Court of Bastrop County was final and conclusive is regarded as sound and precludes the relator from further prosecution of his appeal.

The judgment remanding the relator is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte T.W.A.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2022
Rodriguez, Alberto
466 S.W.3d 846 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2015)
Ex parte Clinnard
169 S.W.2d 181 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1943)
Ex parte Pruitt
141 S.W.2d 333 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 S.W.2d 598, 131 Tex. Crim. 438, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-johnson-texcrimapp-1936.