Home/New York Supreme Court/Ex parte Johnson

Ex parte Johnson

3 Cow. 371
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1824
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 3 Cow. 371 (Ex parte Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Johnson, 3 Cow. 371 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The whole was a mere matter of discretion with the Common Pleas. Under the constitution, (art0 4, s. 7) they are the sole judges whether they will notice the charges preferred or not. They hold a constitutional power, with which we will not interfere. Besides, it is a sufficient answer to that part of the case which complains of a false return, that it is more properly triable in another form.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Removal From Office of Droege
90 N.E. 340 (New York Court of Appeals, 1909)
People & Platt v. Stout
11 Abb. Pr. 17 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)
Fish v. Weatherwax
2 Johns. Cas. 215 (New York Supreme Court, 1801)
Judges of Oneida Common Pleas v. People ex rel. Savage
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 325 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1799)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cow. 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-johnson-nysupct-1824.