Ex parte Johnson

2 Paige Ch. 282, 1830 N.Y. LEXIS 406, 1830 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 59
New York Court of Chancery·Decided June 21, 1830·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Chancellor

decided that a retaining fee to solicitor and counsel was not allowable upon opposing a motion founded upon a petition for instructions to a receiver in the discharge of his duty. That like costs on a denial of the application must be taxed as are allowed for resisting a special motion. That on applications for commissions of lunacy, and other special proceedings of a like nature, where solicitors are actually employed to conduct the proceedings, a retaining fee ought to be allowed to the solicitor. But that retaining fees to counsel are only allowed where counsel are actually employed in a cause or suit strictly so called, in which ' there are adverse proceeding, or where there is a complainant and a defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Johnson, 2 Paige Ch. 282, 1830 N.Y. LEXIS 406, 1830 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 59 (N.Y. 1830).

2 Paige Ch. 282 (Ex parte Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carroll v. Perry
5 F. Cas. 167 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan, 1845)