Ex Parte Jesse Ruiz v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 30, 2025
Docket03-24-00604-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Jesse Ruiz v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Jesse Ruiz v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Jesse Ruiz v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00604-CR

Ex parte Jesse Ruiz

FROM THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-DC-23-300413, THE HONORABLE BRANDY MUELLER, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Jesse Ruiz appeals from the trial court’s denial of his pretrial

application for writ of habeas corpus challenging his bond amount. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc.

arts. 11.08, 11.24. Ruiz was indicted for six counts of second-degree sexual assault of a child,

and the trial court set his bond at $50,000. See Tex. Penal Code § 22.011(a)(2). A supplemental

clerk’s record filed in this case shows that, while this appeal was pending and pursuant to a plea

bargain, Ruiz was convicted of third-degree injury to a child with intent to commit bodily injury

and sentenced to three years’ confinement. See id. § 22.04(f).

Because Ruiz has been convicted and sentenced, he is no longer subject to pretrial

confinement, and his appeal challenging the amount of pretrial bond has been rendered

moot. See Ex parte Tucker, 3 S.W.3d 576, 576 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Danziger v. State,

786 S.W.2d 723, 724 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990); Martinez v. State, 826 S.W.2d 620, 620 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1992); Armendarez v. State, 798 S.W.2d 291, 291 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). Accordingly, we dismiss as moot Ruiz’s appeal from the denial of his pretrial habeas application.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

__________________________________________ Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice

Before Justices Triana, Theofanis, and Crump

Dismissed as Moot

Filed: May 30, 2025

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Danziger v. State
786 S.W.2d 723 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Martinez v. State
826 S.W.2d 620 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Armendarez v. State
798 S.W.2d 291 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Ex parte Tucker
3 S.W.3d 576 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Jesse Ruiz v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-jesse-ruiz-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.