Ex Parte Jesse Rios TDCJ 1812554

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 2, 2016
Docket13-16-00341-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Jesse Rios TDCJ 1812554 (Ex Parte Jesse Rios TDCJ 1812554) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Jesse Rios TDCJ 1812554, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-16-00341-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

EX PARTE JESSE RIOS ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Jesse Rios, attempts to appeal from the trial court’s order denying the

relief requested in his application for writ of habeas corpus. We dismiss the appeal for

want of jurisdiction.

An application for a writ of habeas corpus challenging a conviction in a

misdemeanor case is governed by article 11.09 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.09 (West 2005); Ex parte Tarango, 116 S.W.3d 201, 202 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2003, no pet.). The time to perfect an appeal from an

order in a habeas proceeding is governed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2; Ex parte Rieck, 144 S.W.3d 510, 516 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).

Under Rule 26.2(a)(1), a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after

sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or after the trial court enters an

appealable order. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The trial court entered an order denying

appellant’s request for habeas corpus relief on November 20, 2016. Appellant filed his

notice of appeal on June 28, 2016. On June 28, 2016, the Clerk of this Court notified

appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely perfected and that the appeal

would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt

of the Court’s directive. Appellant filed a response to the Court’s directive by filing a

“Supplemental to Appeal from Order Denying 11.09 Application for Writ of Habeas

Corpus.”

Because appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely, we lack jurisdiction over this

appeal. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State,

918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED

FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 2nd day of September, 2016.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Ex Parte Tarango
116 S.W.3d 201 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Ex Parte Rieck
144 S.W.3d 510 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Jesse Rios TDCJ 1812554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-jesse-rios-tdcj-1812554-texapp-2016.