Ex Parte: Jesse P. Skinner v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 6, 2013·No. 05-12-00576-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered February 6, 2013

In The ¯ ,ourt of p eaIS

No. 05-12-00576-CV

EX PARTE: JESSE P. SKINNER

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. X11-1264-K

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s February 1, 2013 motion for objection to the supplemental

clerk’s record filed in this Court on January 25, 2013. Appellant complains that the Dallas

County Respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment contained in the supplemental clerk’s

record does not contain the clerk’s seal. Appellant attaches to his motion his own copy of the

motion for summary judgment that contains the District Clerk’s seal certifying that it ~s a true

and correct copy of the document. Page fifteen of the supplemental clerk’s record contains the

District Clerk’s certification that all documents in the supplemental clerk’s record are true and

correct cop~es. Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion to the extent that it requests that the

Court order the original document.

To the extent appellant asks that the Court return to him his copy of the documents attached to his motion, we DEFER that determination to the submissions panel.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte: Jesse P. Skinner v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Ex Parte: Jesse P. Skinner v. State (Ex Parte: Jesse P. Skinner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.