Ex Parte Jamin Stocker
This text of Ex Parte Jamin Stocker (Ex Parte Jamin Stocker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order filed October 10, 2019
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-19-00661-CR NO. 14-19-00662-CR NO. 14-19-00663-CR ____________
EX PARTE JAMIN STOCKER
On Appeal from the 248th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1643380, 1643381, & 1643382
ORDER
This is an appeal from the denial of an application for writ of habeas corpus. Appellant is not represented by counsel. No brief has been filed. It is a well- established principle of federal and state law that no constitutional right to counsel exists on a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Graves, 70 S.W.3d 103, 110 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). The court issues the following order:
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 31.1, we ORDER appellant to file a brief in this appeal on or before November 12, 2019. If appellant fails to file his brief as ordered, we will decide this appeal upon the record before the court. See Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687, 688 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994) (affirming conviction on record alone where appellant failed to file a pro se brief after being properly admonished); Coleman v. State, 774 S.W.2d 736, 738–39 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1989, no pet.) (holding that former rule 74(l)(2) (now Rule 38.8(b)) permitted an appeal to be considered without briefs “as justice may require” when a pro se appellant has not complied with the rules of appellate procedure).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Hassan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Jamin Stocker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-jamin-stocker-texapp-2019.