Ex Parte James

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ex Parte James

69 S.W.2d 127, 125 Tex. Crim. 440, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 126

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 28, 1934·No. No. 16721.·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

This appeal is from an order of the District Judge of San Patricio County refusing to reduce the amount of bail in a case where the charge was robbery by the use of firearms in which bail had theretofore been fixed at $5000.00.

The record is precisely like that in the companion case of Ex parte Boyd Nelson, No. 16,720, in which the judgment refusing to reduce bail was affirmed. For the reasons stated in that opinion the order here will be the same.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Judge.

This appeal is from an order of the District Judge of San Patricio County refusing to reduce the amount of bail in a case where the charge was robbery by the use of firearms in which bail had theretofore been fixed at $5000.00.

The record is precisely like that in the companion case of Ex parte Boyd Nelson, No. 16,720, in which the judgment refusing to reduce bail was affirmed. For the reasons stated in that opinion the order here will be the same.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Ex Parte James, 69 S.W.2d 127, 125 Tex. Crim. 440, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 126 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

69 S.W.2d 127 (Ex Parte James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.