Ex parte Jacobi

104 F. 681, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4861
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana
DecidedAugust 20, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 104 F. 681 (Ex parte Jacobi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Jacobi, 104 F. 681, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4861 (circtedla 1900).

Opinion

SHELBY, Circuit Judge.

1. This is an application for an appeal to the United States circuit court of appeals from the decision of a circuit judge at chambers in a habeas corpus case. The decision of a circuit judge at chambers in such case is not the final decision of a court. No appeal lies in such case. Lambert v. Barrett, 157 U. S. 697, 15 Sup. Ct. 722, 39 L. Ed. 865; Carper v. Fitzgerald, 121 U. S. 87, 7 Sup. Ct. 825, 30 L. Ed. 882; Ex parte Lennon, 150 U. S. 393, 14 Sup. Ct. 123, 37 L. Ed. 1120; Act March 3, 1891; Rev. St. §§ 763, 764.

2. The traverse of the sheriff’s return alleges that Sanford Jacobi is detained in custody in violation of the constitution of the United States. The case, therefore, is one involving “the construction or application of the constitution of the. United States.” This is also shown by the assignment of errors. In such case, if decided by the circuit court, the appeal could only be taken to the supreme court. It could not be properly taken to the court of appeals. Act March 3, 1891, §§ 5, 6; Pennsylvania Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. City of Austin, 168 U. S. 685, 18 Sup. Ct. 223, 42 L. Ed. 626; City of Walla Walla v. Walla Walla Water Co.. 172 U. S. 1, 19 Sup. Ct. 77, 43 L. Ed. 341; Scott v. Donald, 165 U. S. 58, 17 Sup. Ct. 265, 41 L. Ed. 632; Holder v. [682]*682Aultman, Miller & Co., 169 U. S. 88, 18 Sup. Ct. 269, 42 L. Ed. 669; Horner v. U. S., 143 U. S. 570, 12 Sup. Ct. 522, 36 L. Ed. 266; Railroad Co. v. Adams, 35 C. C. A. 635, 93 Fed. 852; City of Macon v. Georgia Packing Co., 9 C. C. A. 262, 60 Fed. 781; and City of Dawson v. Columbia Ave. Saving Fund, Safe Deposit, Title & Trust Co., 42 C. C. A. 258, 102 Fed. 200, and cases cited in last case. The application for appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Craig v. Hecht
263 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 F. 681, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-jacobi-circtedla-1900.