Ex parte Isaacs

12 Wend. 193
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 5, 1834
StatusPublished

This text of 12 Wend. 193 (Ex parte Isaacs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Isaacs, 12 Wend. 193 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1834).

Opinion

[194]*194 By the court,

Nelson J.

The statute directs that a certio-rari of this kind shall not be effectual to remove a cause, unless it be filed in the office of the clerk of the court in which such action is pending, after the defendants shall have duly appeared. 2 R. S. 389, § 7. The statute, to be sure, speaks of an appearance by entering and perfecting special bail, if bail shall have been required ; but in analogy to the statute, when no bail is required as when the suit is commenced by declaration, the defendants should have caused their appearance to have been entered by the clerk before suing out the certiorari. The notice of retainer was not enough.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Wend. 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-isaacs-nysupct-1834.