Home/Supreme Court of Alabama/Ex Parte Inzer

Ex Parte Inzer

447 So. 2d 850
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 2, 1984·No. 83-301·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The conclusions of the Court of Criminal Appeals are not in conflict with those reached in Ingle v. State, 415 So.2d 1225 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982); we therefore deny the writ. In doing so, however, we do not intend to endorse the reasoning or dicta included within Inzer v. State, 447 So.2d 838 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982).

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, ALMON and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Inzer, 447 So. 2d 850 (Ala. 1984).

447 So. 2d 850 (Ex Parte Inzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sabiar v. State
526 So. 2d 661 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1988)
Thomas v. State
539 So. 2d 375 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1988)
Creech v. State
508 So. 2d 302 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1987)
Hodges v. State
500 So. 2d 1273 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Fleming v. State
470 So. 2d 1343 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
Hunt v. State
453 So. 2d 1083 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)