Ex parte Ingram

185 So. 2d 149, 43 Ala. App. 709, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 598
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 5, 1966
StatusPublished

This text of 185 So. 2d 149 (Ex parte Ingram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Ingram, 185 So. 2d 149, 43 Ala. App. 709, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 598 (Ala. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

The writ of habeas corpus is not the proper mode of presenting the questions incident to lack of counsel on arraignment.

Hence, the purported appeal from the Montgomery Circuit Court seeks review of a futile judicial labor.

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution in the Circuit Court.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 So. 2d 149, 43 Ala. App. 709, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-ingram-alactapp-1966.