Ex parte Ingram

185 So. 2d 149, 43 Ala. App. 709, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 598
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 5, 1966·Published

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

The writ of habeas corpus is not the proper mode of presenting the questions incident to lack of counsel on arraignment.

Hence, the purported appeal from the Montgomery Circuit Court seeks review of a futile judicial labor.

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution in the Circuit Court.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Ingram, 185 So. 2d 149, 43 Ala. App. 709, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 598 (Ala. Ct. App. 1966).

185 So. 2d 149 (Ex parte Ingram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.