Ex parte Hussey

85 P. 332, 48 Or. 621, 1906 Ore. LEXIS 62
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedApril 10, 1906
StatusPublished

This text of 85 P. 332 (Ex parte Hussey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Hussey, 85 P. 332, 48 Or. 621, 1906 Ore. LEXIS 62 (Or. 1906).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the court.

The petitioner, E. D. Hussey, was convicted in the recorder’s court of North Bend, Coos County, for violating the provisions of the local option act as claimed to have been adopted in that county November 8, 1904, by a majority of votes cast in favor of prohibition, and having been adjudged to pay a fine of $50 and to be incarcerated until such amercement was paid, he petitioned the court to be discharged from the restraint thus imposed, on the ground that he was illegally deprived of his liberty. The petition was denied and he appeals.

In the case of Marsden v. Harlocker, 48 Or. 90 (85 Pac. 328), we decided that the vote on the local option act cast in Coos County, November 8, 1904, was void, and as the conclusion there reached is controlling herein it follows that the judgment in the case at bar must be reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to discharge the prisoner; and it is so ordered.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marsden v. Harlocker
85 P. 328 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 P. 332, 48 Or. 621, 1906 Ore. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-hussey-or-1906.