Ex parte Hunt

5 Cow. 284
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1826
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 5 Cow. 284 (Ex parte Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Hunt, 5 Cow. 284 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1826).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The statute is, that, the children and grandchildren shall maintain their indigent parents and grand parents. The paupers are the maternal grand parents of Hunt.

He is thus within the terms of the statute ; and we see no reason, in principle or authority, why he should be exempted. The authorities cited, exempt the son-in-law, on the ground that the statute means natural relations only, which’ is not this case. We have nothing to do with the question of expediency.

It is questionable whether a mandamus lies, the matter being res judicata in the court below. But whether it does or not, we are clear against the relator on the merits.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberts v. State
14 Ga. 8 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1853)
Reynolds v. Champlain Transportation Co.
9 How. Pr. 7 (New York Supreme Court, 1853)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Cow. 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-hunt-nysupct-1826.