Ex Parte Humphries

1925 OK CR 359, 237 P. 624, 237 P. 621, 31 Okla. Crim. 172, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 341
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 7, 1925
DocketNo. A-5679.
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 1925 OK CR 359 (Ex Parte Humphries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Humphries, 1925 OK CR 359, 237 P. 624, 237 P. 621, 31 Okla. Crim. 172, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 341 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon presentation and hearing of this petition for writ of habeas corpus of Delton Hum-phries, the proof shows that the petitioner is now and for some months past has been incarcerated in the state *173 penitentiary at Granite by authority of a conviction for burglary, judgment upon which was rendered in the district court of Murray county; that at the time of the rendition of judgment the petitioner was under the age of 16 years, and that no investigation was had in the juvenile court as is in such cases by law provided.

In the case of Ex parte Pyzer, 29 Okla. Cr. 156, 232 P. 962, this court held:

“If the record in a felony case in the district (or superior) court fails to affirmatively disclose that an issue of fact was tried and determined, finding that the offender was over the age of 16 years, that issue remains open for this court to determine in a habeas corpus proceeding.
“A child under the age of 16 years cannot be guilty of the commission of a crime except in cases where it is shown by the findings of a juvenile court that the child knew the wrongfulness of the act charged.”

The reasons and authorities for such conclusions are set out in the Pyzer Case.

The prayer of the petitioner is therefore granted, and the petitioner is ordered released from the custody of the warden, or superintendent of the state reformatory at Granite, upon delivery to him of an attested copy of this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wheeler v. Shoemake
57 So. 2d 267 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1952)
Wade v. Warden of State Prison
73 A.2d 128 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1950)
Ex Parte Lewis
1947 OK CR 151 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1947)
Wilson v. State
1938 OK CR 81 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1938)
Ex Parte Alton
1927 OK CR 362 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1925 OK CR 359, 237 P. 624, 237 P. 621, 31 Okla. Crim. 172, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-humphries-oklacrimapp-1925.