Ex Parte Humphrey

456 S.W.2d 118, 1970 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1465
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 10, 1970
Docket43184
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 456 S.W.2d 118 (Ex Parte Humphrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Humphrey, 456 S.W.2d 118, 1970 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1465 (Tex. 1970).

Opinion

OPINION

BELCHER, Judge.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding instituted under the provisions of Article 11.07, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., by an inmate of the Texas Department of Corrections, attacking as void the conviction under which he is now confined, and he seeks his discharge therefrom.

The record in this case was transmitted from the 97th District Court of Montague County, Texas to this Court along with the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The record reflects that the petitioner plead guilty in Cause No. 9011 in the 97th District Court of Montague County, Texas to the offense of robbery by assault, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections for life.

*119 From an examination of the petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus and the record at the original trial, Judge Louis T. Holland, found as a matter of fact that the petitioner was not adequately admonished as to the punishment provided by law for the offense charged and the punishment which could be assessed under his plea, and he concluded as a matter of law that the judgment in Cause No. 9011 is invalid and that the petitioner is, therefore, illegally restrained of his liberty. Article 26.13, V.A.C.C.P.; Alexander v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 53, 288 S.W. 2d 779; Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 415 S.W.2d 917.

The trial court’s findings are supported by the record. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted; the conviction is set aside, and the petitioner is ordered remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Montague County, Texas to answer the indictment in Cause Number 9011.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. State
524 S.W.2d 712 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1975)
Ex Parte Taylor
522 S.W.2d 479 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1975)
Bosworth v. State
510 S.W.2d 334 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Wright v. State
499 S.W.2d 326 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Jefferson v. State
486 S.W.2d 782 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Crocker v. State
485 S.W.2d 566 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
456 S.W.2d 118, 1970 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-humphrey-texcrimapp-1970.