Ex parte Hughes

11 S.W.2d 319
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 21, 1928
DocketNo. 12006
StatusPublished

This text of 11 S.W.2d 319 (Ex parte Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Hughes, 11 S.W.2d 319 (Tex. 1928).

Opinion

MARTIN, J.

Offense, illegal marking of a hog; penalty, two years.

We find the record in this condition; Motion for new trial was overruled and notice of appeal given and entered of record on March 7, 1928. The statement of facts and all bills of exception were filed June 8, 1928, which was more than 90 days after notice of appeal was given. Under the terms of article 760, subd. 5, C. C. P. (1925), these matters were filed too late for consideration by this court. See, also, White v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 4 S.W.(2d) 547; Lattimore v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 4 S.W.(2d) 552, and authorities there cited.

The state’s attorney has filed motion to strike from the record the said statement of facts and bills of exception and affirm this cause.

Under the plain provisions of the statute and the uniform decisions of this court, the state’s motion must be granted, and, there being nothing presented for review, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lattimore v. State
4 S.W.2d 552 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 S.W.2d 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-hughes-texcrimapp-1928.