Ex Parte Hooper

453 So. 2d 1066
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 11, 1984
Docket82-675
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 453 So. 2d 1066 (Ex Parte Hooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Hooper, 453 So. 2d 1066 (Ala. 1984).

Opinions

Upon consideration of the petition, brief of petitioner, and the State's brief in opposition thereto, the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals, 453 So.2d 1066, granting the State of Alabama's petition for mandamus is reversed and this cause is remanded for an order consistent herewith.

Mandamus will not lie to compel the trial court's exercise of discretion in a particular manner, nor to review the lower court's proceedings for error, nor as a substitute for appeal.State v. Cannon, 369 So.2d 32 (Ala. 1978).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON, SHORES, BEATTY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

MADDOX, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex parte State of Alabama.
165 So. 3d 576 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2014)
State v. Blue
617 So. 2d 700 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1993)
Rogers v. Cace, Inc.
533 So. 2d 245 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1988)
Ex Parte Rogers
533 So. 2d 245 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1988)
State v. Sides
501 So. 2d 1259 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
State v. Waters
453 So. 2d 1067 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 So. 2d 1066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-hooper-ala-1984.