Ex Parte Hooper
This text of 453 So. 2d 1066 (Ex Parte Hooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Upon consideration of the petition, brief of petitioner, and the State's brief in opposition thereto, the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals,
Mandamus will not lie to compel the trial court's exercise of discretion in a particular manner, nor to review the lower court's proceedings for error, nor as a substitute for appeal.State v. Cannon,
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON, SHORES, BEATTY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
MADDOX, J., concurs specially.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
453 So. 2d 1066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-hooper-ala-1984.