Ex parte Holbrook
5 Cow. 35
Opinion
remarked, in giving the opinion of the Court, that it involved the same point with that; for it was clear that a general power to defend all causes, <fcc., would not authorize the attorney to execute an appeal bo“~d in the name of his client.
Rule for a mandamus
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex parte Holbrook, 5 Cow. 35 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1825).
5 Cow. 35 (Ex parte Holbrook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Murray v. Peckham
3 A. 662 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1886)
Ex parte McAnally
53 Ala. 495 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)
People & Taylor v. Mayor of New York
11 Abb. Pr. 66 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)
Taylor v. Ricards & Hoffman
4 Ark. 378 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1849)