Ex Parte Hinson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte Hinson

776 So. 2d 814, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 254, 2000 WL 869567

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 30, 2000·No. 1980952·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, HOUSTON, COOK, SEE, LYONS, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, HOUSTON, COOK, SEE, LYONS, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.

Ex Parte Hinson, 776 So. 2d 814, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 254, 2000 WL 869567 (Ala. 2000).

Pincite

776 So. 2d 814 (Ex Parte Hinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related