Ex parte Hill
3 Cow. 355
Opinion
It is the settled doctrine, that though such conduct as this is a contempt of the Court; yet it is not a ground for avoiding the verdict. The cases on this subject are all collected by the Reporter, in a note to Smith v. Thompson, (1 Cowen's Rep. 221.) Let an alternative mandamus issue.
Rule accordingly»
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex parte Hill, 3 Cow. 355 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).
3 Cow. 355 (Ex parte Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hanrahan v. Ayres
10 Misc. 435 (Superior Court of Buffalo, 1894)
Sanitary District v. Cullerton
35 N.E. 723 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1893)
In re Cary
10 F. 622 (S.D. New York, 1882)
Clews v. Bainbridge
44 How. Pr. 357 (New York Supreme Court, 1873)
McCann v. State
1 Morr. St. Cas. 399 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1872)
Anthony v. Smith
17 Bosw. 503 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1859)
Cook v. Walters
4 Iowa 72 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1856)
State v. Camp
23 Vt. 551 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1851)