Ex parte Hill
3 Cow. 355
This text of 3 Cow. 355 (Ex parte Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ex parte Hill, 3 Cow. 355 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).
Opinion
It is the settled doctrine, that though such conduct as this is a contempt of the Court; yet it is not a ground for avoiding the verdict. The cases on this subject are all collected by the Reporter, in a note to Smith v. Thompson, (1 Cowen's Rep. 221.) Let an alternative mandamus issue.
Rule accordingly»
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hanrahan v. Ayres
10 Misc. 435 (Superior Court of Buffalo, 1894)
Sanitary District v. Cullerton
35 N.E. 723 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1893)
In re Cary
10 F. 622 (S.D. New York, 1882)
Clews v. Bainbridge
44 How. Pr. 357 (New York Supreme Court, 1873)
McCann v. State
1 Morr. St. Cas. 399 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1872)
Anthony v. Smith
17 Bosw. 503 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1859)
Cook v. Walters
4 Iowa 72 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1856)
State v. Camp
23 Vt. 551 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1851)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Cow. 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-hill-nysupct-1824.