Ex parte Hertz

139 N.E.2d 645, 74 Ohio Law. Abs. 71, 1953 Ohio App. LEXIS 903
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided April 2, 1953·No. No. 4928·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT.

This is an application for leave to appeal, in the case of State of Ohio v. Carl C. Hertz, No. 92781, Franklin County, Ohio, more than thirty days after sentence and judgment. Such an appeal is permissible under §13459-4 GC “only by leave of Court or two of the Judges thereof ” This Court recently held in State v. McGahan, 86 Oh Ap 283, that leave to appeal would not be granted without a showing of good cause. See also, In re Martin, 61 Abs 309, 104 N. E. (2d) 194. The only ground set forth by this petitioner is that he learned that his sentence was illegal, after he became incarcerated. This, in our opinion, does not constitute good cause for the granting of an appeal more than thirty days after sentence and judgment.

WISEMAN, PJ, MILLER and HORNBECK, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Hertz, 139 N.E.2d 645, 74 Ohio Law. Abs. 71, 1953 Ohio App. LEXIS 903 (Ohio Ct. App. 1953).

139 N.E.2d 645 (Ex parte Hertz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lewis v. Cardwell
354 F. Supp. 26 (S.D. Ohio, 1972)
State v. Forsythe
184 N.E.2d 467 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1959)