Ex parte Herrera

608 S.W.2d 683, 1980 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1483
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 10, 1980·No. No. 66218·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is a post conviction habeas corpus proceeding under Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. The applicant was convicted in 1979 in cause number 17,354 in the 49th District Court of Webb County for the offense of murder.

The applicant contends that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to try the cause because of fundamental error in the indictment in which an impossible date for the commission of the offense was alleged.

The date of the offense was alleged to have been committed “on or about the 10th day of November A. D. 19 8 and anterior to the presentment of the indictment.... ”

Many cases have held that an indictment is fundamentally defective if it alleges that the offense was committed on an impossible date. See Ex parte Millard, 587 S.W.2d 703 (Tex.Cr.App.1979), and Barnes v. State, 42 Tex.Cr.R. 297, 59 S.W. 882 (1900). It is impossible that appellant could have committed the offense in “19 8 ”.

The relief sought is granted. The applicant is ordered discharged from custody in this cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Herrera, 608 S.W.2d 683, 1980 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1483 (Tex. 1980).

608 S.W.2d 683 (Ex parte Herrera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gibson v. State
769 S.W.2d 706 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Rodriguez v. State
744 S.W.2d 361 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Ex Parte Miller
631 S.W.2d 825 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)